Flooding is a natural process that can have a major effect on individuals, communities, the... More
Closes in 2 months
| Open Consultations | Date Closes |
|---|---|
| Proposal for Southfields Drive Sports Centre (TNS) | 26 Sep 2017 |
| Social Welfare Advice consultation | 6 Oct 2017 |
| 20mph Zone - The Newry Area | 9 Oct 2017 |
| Sexual health services review | 15 Oct 2017 |
| Open space, sport and recreation study | 29 Oct 2017 |
| See All Open Consultations | |
| Closed Consultations | Date Closed |
|---|---|
| Healthwatch proposals | 8 Sep 2017 |
| Proposed new adult social care Prevention and Wellbeing Grant Fund | 1 Sep 2017 |
| Evington Village proposed 20MPH zone | 18 Aug 2017 |
| Single smoke control area | 13 Aug 2017 |
| Proposed changes to adult social care prevention services commissioned from the voluntary sector | 28 Jul 2017 |
| See All Closed Consultations | |
Here are some of the issues we have consulted on and their outcomes. See all outcomes
There were 356 responses to the survey giving a wide range of views. Many respondents provided comments and/or alternative proposals.
Some providers said they would like more information about the proposals, and more time in order to respond to the consultation. We are analysing the consultation feedback and considering the next steps for the review in the light of the feedback. We will provide further information about the next steps in the review as soon as possible.
We asked for your views on a proposed 20mph Zone for the Knighton Fields area.
Consultations were carried out by letter drop to frontage properties and advertising on the city council's website.
Of the 160 responses made, 135 (84%) were in favour of the 20mph speed limit, and 102 (64%) were in favour of the proposed traffic calming.
As a result of the support shown for these proposals the city mayor has approved implementation of the scheme which is programmed to be implemented during the summer 2017.
We asked for your views on the proposed revision to the boundary of the Church Gate Conservation area as well as comments on the proposed revised character appraisal and new standalone management plan.
While there was some feeling that the heritage designation was a hindrance, there was broad support for the conservation area and the continued protection of buildings in the area through the conservation area status. No adverse comments were made regarding the conservation area boundary changes. Support was also expressed for improved cycle infrastructure within the area.
The boundary of the conservation area was amended in line with the consultation documents. The Character Appraisal and Management Plan were amended in line with comments received and have been adopted. Comments relating to cycle infrastructure have been passed to the relevant team in highways.